Rayvn Cullor, a reporter for a five-day-a-week newspaper, filed a complaint against besieged Council Member Art Brieno for ‘inappropriate’ comments following a July 21 interview, according to a copy of the complaint filed with the City of Hanford.
The alleged comments were ironic because the topic of the interview was Brieno’s interactions with Darlene Mata, community development director, who is suing the city for $1.43 million for alleged sexual harassment by Brieno. Brieno was censured by the city council earlier this year following revelations in an investigator’s report that Brieno made comments that were allegedly demeaning about Mata based on her gender.
Curiously the complaint is dated July 14, 2021 but the interview where the comments were made occurred on July 21, 2021, a week after the complaint was filed.
In the latest allegations against Brieno, he allegedly said, according to Cullor’s complaint: “I have to say, you are a very attractive young woman. Your boyfriend is lucky. You must have a sister who is…”
Brieno said the comments were taken out of context.
At the beginning of the interview conducted at Hidden Valley Park Brieno asked her what brought her to California. Brieno said she told him her boyfriend was in the Navy. Brieno said he always finds it interesting to discuss people in the Navy. Following the end of the interview, after Cullor turned off a tape recorder, Brieno said he told her: “he’s (her boyfriend) lucky, you’re an attractive gal.”
The next day, Brieno said, he received a call from Cullor which she recorded. Brieno said she asked him about the comments on her physical appearance and a question regarding whether she had a sister. Brieno disputed Cullor’s account on the second point. He said he asked her whether she had any brothers and sisters.
He then told her since she had brought the matter up, it must have been a “poor comment.” The two then discussed whether if she were a male, would he make the same comment?
The Visalia-Hanford-Lemoore Future attempted to contact the publisher of the five-day per week newspaper by phone and email to see why the publication had not done a story on Cullor’s complaint. The call was not returned nor was there any email in reply.
The explanation in the complaint regarding why the reporter wrote no article after her interactions with Brieno was: “After discussion with my editor, we chose not to write an article and to write this letter instead, as to allow me to process the interaction and be rightfully upset, because I no longer had to maintain my own objectivity in the situation.”
Brieno said he asked to talk to Cullor’s supervisor and some days later he got a call from Terri Leifeste, vice president and group publisher of the publication. Brieno said he gave his side of the story on the interaction with Cullor.
Cullor said in the complaint that she understood his motivation was “…complimentary and not negative. However, an elected official commented on the appearance of a female reporter during a professional meeting, and that is never appropriate. I understand others may have a different perspective on this issue, but I was personally upset by the comment.”
“Women, especially young women, are constantly having their value in professional spaces measured, partly or wholly, by their appearance,” the complaint said.
“Mr. Brieno” the complaint said “said he would make a similar comment to a man, that he seemed healthy or that he must work out. It seems clear to me, though, that a comment on a woman’s inherent appearance and one on a man’s health regiment are very different.”
Cullor also said in the complaint the reference to her sister, who had recently turned 18, made me “…particularly uncomfortable…” Brieno said he asked whether she had any brothers or sisters because he found that these family members support a relative in times of crisis. He gave the example of his troubles with Mata and members of the Hanford City Council.
Cullor said in the complaint that Brieno’s comments were not malicious but she added: Women “…have the right to openly, clearly and publicly hold people in positions of power accountable for the actions which cause harm.”
Brieno said he does not value women by their appearance. “I am going through gender training,” he said. Brieno said he has had three training sessions thus far and the training is not complete. Brieno said his teacher told him “it’s what they (the person who is offended) perceive” that is important.
She said Brieno never apologized for his comments and spent time justifying himself. Brieno said she never said she was offended.
Cullor said the council is required to take sensitivity training and if that training does not include what kinds of comments are appropriate in professional settings, it needs to be included. If an elected official is “…willingly ignoring that direction, and if that member is willing to make an inappropriate comment to a reporter, what’s to say that staff, contractors, constituents, residents and other women who must come in contact with that elected official in a professional context aren’t facing the same thing.”
10 thoughts on “Letter of Complaint Filed in Hanford against Brieno for Inappropriate Comments”
(Commenter ID is a unique per-article, per-person commenter identifier. If multiple names have the same Commenter ID, it is likely they are the same person. For more information, click here.)
I’m curious. Is the picture attached to this article one of Rayvn Cullor? Some might view this picture as being kind of titillating…..the bare midriff along with a snuggly fitted top with the buttons (both at the top and at the bottom) left unbutton drawing viewers attention to her breasts. Posting this particular picture seems ironic while reading: “Women, especially young women, are constantly having their value in professional spaces measured, partly or wholly, by their appearance,” the complaint said.” “Cullor said in the complaint that she understood his motivation was “…complimentary and not negative” yet she is publicly issuing a letter of complaint against him regardless. Seems either frivolous or attention seeking on her part. Some could fairly or unfairly conclude that it’s the latter. Question: Will Cullor next go after Mark Pratter for attaching this picture of her to this article instead of one of her wearing what she normally wears to work…… assuming that this isn’t how she presents herself while on the job?
Yah I agree. Why did Mark choose that picture. Even when males dress unprofessional they cover up their body parts. It’s all to seek attention and get their no name newspaper noticed
Imagine spending so much time in the comments section of a ‘no name newspaper’!
Calling out morons who think they actually work for a newspaper.
This is a much more appropriate picture that is now attached to this article instead of the original one was first posted. Excellent decision! A lesson learned and hopefully remembered. In the world of news a picture can be worth a thousand words.
The dates are wrong I’m the compliant. How can anyone take this seriously. Unless you have an audio recording She has no leg to stand on. Brieno is dumb though he needs to shut up and stop talking to people.
What a crazy world we live in where you cannot even compliment anyone. This reporter is way off base, just another left wing lunatic hoping to cash in or get her name out there. Here are some questions. Did he know he was being recorded the second time around? If not that is against the wiretap law. Did she immediately express disconcert with his comments, and ask him to stop, or was this provoked at a later time. If you want to be looked at as professional, you need to act professional. I would hope others may look at this and think twice about granting her or her team any interviews. I mean you will need to walk on eggshells, and anything you say she can and may twist against you. Telling someone they are attractive is not harassment, or unbecoming behavior, and did not cause any harm at all. The real problem here is all these liberal agencies teaching people to be offended. Its giving a compliment. Left wing wackos and super liberal femanists groups have a twisted view on society. This is clearly an attack piece written by the voice against Brieno, and he fell right into their hands. I wonder if your lawyers that fund the valley voice will attempt to sue on her behalf. Sars and Melo must be proud of you all. The voice is nothing but hit piece for special interests that sue cities and other agencies.
Cut out this “left wing wackos and super liberal femanists groups” crapola. You are clearly using this article as an excuse to bash The Voice.
I am a woman. If a comment (no matter where it’s said) saying I’m attractive makes me feel devalued, then I have a lot more growing up to do. If it was offensive to the recipient, it should have been nipped in the bud at that time had she been mature enough to put him “in his place” at that moment and be done with it.My value come from within, knowing my worth, abilities and secure that what someone else says doesn’t mean that’s who I am. Miss Cullar,,,,you give REAL women a bad name. Grow up Girl.
Totally agree with comments above.Tthis female cannot take some compliments and twist it around to be a crime. She is NO LADY in my book, but a looking for trouble, get ner name out there ( A bad name !) She is an embarrassment !!!