Failure of Prop 13 not stopping Visalia Unified’s fifth high school

Lack of state funding for school construction will not stop the Visalia Unified School District’s (VUSD) plan to construct a fifth high school, says Superintendent Dr. Tamara Ravalin.

VUSD’s trustees met for a study session on March 17 to discuss how to proceed in the wake of the failure of Prop 13, a $15 billion dollar bond measure.

“We’re still in the design development stage,” Ravalin said. “We’re looking at additional options going forward.”

No Money, Big Plans

In 2018, voters living in the VUSD approved Measure A, authorizing the sale of $105.3 million in bonds to finance modernization of middle and high school science labs, enhance security at VUSD campuses and to pay for construction of a fifth high school. Those plans have now been, at least temporarily, stymied by the failure of Prop 13.

“We couldn’t move forward with construction without a bond from the state,” Ravalin said.

Despite the setback, the district continues planning with the hope voters will approve bonds for construction funding in an upcoming election. While they wait, VUSD trustees and staff have been busy defining the scope of the project.

“We’ve been focusing on working with the architects and the stakeholder groups,” Ravalin said.

Primary among the stakeholders are the teachers who will staff the new school. Teachers in various areas, such as agriculture, music, physical education and science, will have very different needs, and the new high school must be designed with them in mind.

“Building a high school is sort of like building a little city,” Ravalin said. “We’ve been working at getting that information on what would be best. Also, our teams are going out and looking at high schools built recently in the Valley.”

Playing the Waiting Game

Even without Prop 13 money, the VUSD may be able to stick to its original timeline. Of course, that likelihood is dependent on whether voters are interested in investing in school construction.

“We didn’t plan on it (the fifth high school) opening until fall of 2024,” Ravalin said. “That’s still possible, but that depends on if a state bond is passed in November. If that gets pushed out, then our timeline gets pushed out as well.”

With the uncertainty of funding from the state, the VUSD must still have its construction plans ready to ensure the district doesn’t get passed over when and if the money is distributed.

“We still need to get in line,” Ravalin said. “If we get in line, we have a better chance when funds become available, which won’t be soon.”

That still won’t guarantee VUSD’s plans will be funded, yet it’s critical the district is prepared.

“If you wait and don’t get in line, you have less chance of getting money,” Ravalin said. “Those in line get their money first, and when it’s gone it’s gone.”

Choices Limited by Uncertainty

At its study session, the VUSD trustees were to weigh options and review costs. Those building options and construction costs are based on surveys of high schools currently being built in the area.

The complexity of that task is made far greater by not knowing what funding the state will provide or when it will provide it, leaving the VUSD trustees in a hard place.

“It’s difficult for them to make a decision when they don’t know what a state bond will look like,” Ravalin said. “How much we get from the state would depend on how much the (possible) state bond allows. Now, we’ll have to wait and see what a new state bond would afford us.”

Yet, the funding approved by voters locally through the passage of Measure A will not all have to sit idle. Of the Measure A funding, $30 million is intended for modernizing science classrooms and adding security measures, work which began with the earlier passage of Measure E. While bond sales approved by Measure A have yet to be sold, Ravalin said, those projects are still in the future.

“We haven’t started any of that work yet,” she said.

Fluid Planning

This week’s study session will give planners direction, allowing them to provide initial ideas that can then be presented to trustees.

“We’ll take information to an upcoming board meeting to vote on one of the conceptual designs,” Ravalin said. “Then the architects can go forth and start the plans.”

When plans are complete, they’ll be submitted to the state for its approval. State approval of the project will give the VUSD a spot in line for financing. Once its plan is approved, the district will have four years to begin construction. Even in that eventuality, finalizing a plan now will save the district time and money.

“We would have to modify the plans because building codes would have changed,” Ravalin said. “We wouldn’t have to put as much work into them (the new plans), but they (the original plans) would have to be withdrawn.”

Plans approved now may also have to be altered depending on how much money the state can provide, a route the VUSD has traveled before.

“Even if we submit plans and a bond gets approved, and we find out there’s not enough money for what the board approved, we’ll have to alter our plans,” Ravalin said. “That’s what happened with El Diamante and Golden West (high schools).”

And the VUSD is prepared for that scenario as well.

“We have options,” Ravalin said. “The layout’s not that different. It really depends on the cost. This is a guess: we’d have a high school, but no theater or stadium. We’d add them later.”

3 thoughts on “Failure of Prop 13 not stopping Visalia Unified’s fifth high school

(Commenter ID is a unique per-article, per-person commenter identifier. If multiple names have the same Commenter ID, it is likely they are the same person. For more information, click here.)

  1. “VUSD’s trustees met for a study session on March 17 to discuss how to proceed in the wake of the failure of Prop 13, a ballot measure that would have raised commercial property tax rates to fund the building of new schools.”

    Prop 13 would not have raised commercial tax rates. It would allowed the State to sell up to $15 billion in bonds that would be paid back from the State’s general fund, not commercial property tax as your article mistakenly describes.

  2. This is literally fake news, it was a bond measure, not a tax raise. How disappointing.

  3. First mistake, name this “Prop. 13”, so blame the author who named this measure “Prop. 13”. “Proposition 13, authored by Long Beach Assemblyman Patrick O’Donnell, would authorize a $15 billion bond for school modernization and construction projects with the bulk of funding ($9 million) going toward elementary schools. However, repaying the bill would cost taxpayers about $740 million a year for 35 years, something that 55% of voters said no to as of Thursday.” – Long Beach Post News.

    Either way, taxes continues to rise each year with each “Measure” on the ballots with no end in sight.

    “The Proposition 13 on the March 3 ballot is a $15 billion school construction bond, but with interest costs, the figure jumps to $27 billion. This is a general obligation bond which will be repaid out of the state’s general fund. The bond is constitutionally obligated to be paid off over 35 years at a cost to taxpayers of $740 million annually. This $740 million must be paid before any other state programs can be funded, including public schools, prisons and Medi-Cal.” – San Diego Union Tribune. Again, this failed bond cost $15B. However, it jumps to $27B,
    So “this newspaper is lame”, either way it DOES raise our taxes! Guess you’re rich and can afford to pay additional taxes? 🙁

Use your voice

Your email address will not be published.