Or could it be DA Fagundes is a liability to the county and a horrible choice for DA that the sheriff in no way wants to be connected to? Fagundes claims to be a conservative but it is a facade. He has no ability to carry out his duties impartially as called out by a judge needing to remove the entire DAs office from cases. A massive sexual harassment lawsuit against the county based on Fagundes’ deviant conduct towards his male chief investigator? A disgraceful track record of questionable conduct by a elected DA? Misuse of county property? Keeping a possible blackmail file on persons? Sending hundreds of inappropriate texts to his male investigator? And the list goes on…Oh no, none of that is a possibility right? Fagundes is really a wonderful person and the sherif and everyone else just can’t see that.

In answer to your question, while I do not know, I suspect the reasons the sheriff is endorsing her are:
1). they’re 2 liberal peas in the left wing pod
2). She has apparently decided to abandon her role as independent oversight for police misconduct (at least as it pertains to the sheriff’s office).

You wouldn’t be making such a comment if Shefiff endorsed Fagundes. What changed? What caused Sheriff to not support Fagundes the sitting DA?

Apparently the sheriff supports democrats. I wonder how that will go over in predominantly republican Kings County?

And it seems I’ve got my own stalker. I guess I’ve arrived.