<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porterville Mayor proposes &#8220;Protect Women&#8217;s Safe Spaces&#8221; ordinance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ourvalleyvoice.com/2025/02/21/porterville-mayor-proposes-protect-womens-safe-spaces-ordinance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ourvalleyvoice.com/2025/02/21/porterville-mayor-proposes-protect-womens-safe-spaces-ordinance/</link>
	<description>In-depth, locally-produced coverage of the Central Valley.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:43:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reeves</title>
		<link>https://www.ourvalleyvoice.com/2025/02/21/porterville-mayor-proposes-protect-womens-safe-spaces-ordinance/#comment-145545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourvalleyvoice.com/?p=50459#comment-145545</guid>
		<description>A portion of the email I have sent to Porterville&#039;s Mayor, and City Council members:

RE: &quot;Protect Women&#039;s Safe Spaces&quot;
This proposal is a solution in search of a problem. There are no verifiable arrests or convictions of a trans-woman sexually assaulting a cis-woman or girl in a bathroom or locker room. It’s just not a thing, but you seem determined to embarrass Porterville by adding to its already notorious reputation as anti-LGBTQ.
I had thought Porterville was making progress, but we’ll see if and when this comes up for a vote if that progress was real, or just fantasy.
I want you to consider the following scenario:
A man decides to follow a woman (or a young girl) into a restroom in order to sexually assault her. He does not want to attract attention, so what does he do? Just walk in? Risky. He stands out dressed like a man. Maybe someone sees him following his target into the restroom. As the ordinances stand now, if he wants to get in without attracting attention, he’ll need to get into some kind of women’s wear. He needs to look like a woman.
Under your proposed ordinance, it will be common to see people who look like men walking into the women’s restroom, because you’ve required trans-men to use them. Our bad guy can now just walk right in, and if anyone challenges him, he can claim to be a trans-man, who you required to use this restroom.
Nobody will know the difference, unless you’re going to post genital inspectors at the door.
Knock off the anti-trans discrimination and hate, Mr. Mayor. It’s a bad look for you, and sets Porterville back a decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A portion of the email I have sent to Porterville&#8217;s Mayor, and City Council members:</p>
<p>RE: &#8220;Protect Women&#8217;s Safe Spaces&#8221;<br />
This proposal is a solution in search of a problem. There are no verifiable arrests or convictions of a trans-woman sexually assaulting a cis-woman or girl in a bathroom or locker room. It’s just not a thing, but you seem determined to embarrass Porterville by adding to its already notorious reputation as anti-LGBTQ.<br />
I had thought Porterville was making progress, but we’ll see if and when this comes up for a vote if that progress was real, or just fantasy.<br />
I want you to consider the following scenario:<br />
A man decides to follow a woman (or a young girl) into a restroom in order to sexually assault her. He does not want to attract attention, so what does he do? Just walk in? Risky. He stands out dressed like a man. Maybe someone sees him following his target into the restroom. As the ordinances stand now, if he wants to get in without attracting attention, he’ll need to get into some kind of women’s wear. He needs to look like a woman.<br />
Under your proposed ordinance, it will be common to see people who look like men walking into the women’s restroom, because you’ve required trans-men to use them. Our bad guy can now just walk right in, and if anyone challenges him, he can claim to be a trans-man, who you required to use this restroom.<br />
Nobody will know the difference, unless you’re going to post genital inspectors at the door.<br />
Knock off the anti-trans discrimination and hate, Mr. Mayor. It’s a bad look for you, and sets Porterville back a decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
