To be clear . It’s my opinion the whole board was apprised at the appropriate time . Two board members were working with staff and legal council according to the cemetery’s Bylaws. Since 2 board members are actively involved. Having other board members apprised early runs the risk of a Serial meeting. So in this case the information is on a need to know bias . Our board Secretary was delegated to train new employees. The chair communicates with legal council and staff . In other words I say Tomato 😊

Barbara. You are a intelligent person ! 😊

Nicely ducked! lol 😝😆😂

Barbara . You are asking me about what someone else did . I speak for myself. If you want to know about why someone else did something then you should ask them .

Ok now you are getting more explicit in your facts! So Ms. Bernardo’s email was the method she used first to apprise the “entire” board in one fell swoop of receiving the notice of cancelation. Not one board member was left out of her email. Of course my original enquiry was asking if she apprised you immediately about the pending loss of insurance coverage and if the other members were left in the dark about it until said email was sent to them. Not understanding why you had said that only two members could be apprised of the fact of cancelation due to the Brown Act. I was talking about when the board members were notified not about board members taking action. But enough of all this , back and forth. You say tomato and I say tamato! lol Hopefully a new insurance carrier contract will soon be signed sealed and delivered. Take care, stay safe.

I think we all now how Citizens for Hospital Accountability was formed and it most certainly isn’t the way you recall it. It was a great group

There is still an ongoing investigation and would appreciate it if you left the Citizens Group alone

This has nothing to do with the cemetery board problems, just want the Citizens Group reflected
accurately.