For the record, my comment was not meant to be an insult upon you Alex. It was meant to be a compliment. I attended college while working in a service job. My apologies that someone took it the wrong way.

You are a laughingstock. Your comments don’t hurt my feelings nor make me feel inferior. I’m a successful business woman, can you say the same?

Have a great day!

I couldn’t agree more about Vanderpoel and one of his appointees. He reappointed Aguilar even though he and the Attorney General had received thousands of recall signatures. Aguilar continues to be the one board member who will never agree to anything brought before the board.

I didn’t know that you studied labor laws in addition to your service job Alex. Good for you.

“There is an important exception to this rule, which is founded upon the Fourteenth Amendment. It arises where there is a deprival of the ‘liberty’ guaranteed all persons by that amendment’s due process clause. The exception will be applied where the probationary employee’s job termination, or dismissal, is based on charges of misconduct which ‘stigmatize’ his reputation, or ‘seriously impair’ his opportunity to earn a living , or which ‘might seriously damage his standing or associations in his community’ .
“Where there is such a deprival of a ‘liberty interest’ the employee’s ‘remedy mandated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is “an opportunity to refute the charge” and “to clear his name.”‘ He must be afforded ‘”‘notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case” before the termination becomes effective.'”‘ ” ( Lubey v. City and County of San Francisco, supra, 98 Cal. App. 3d at p. 346.)

https://www.lawpipe.com/California/Lubey_v_City_and_County_of_San_Francisco.html