As I just mentioned above, it read to me like the judge said the DA did a sloppy job on the Writ, and they/we are free to fix it and file again. I hope the DA’s office is working on it!
Just because we don’t like the ruling doesn’t mean the judge is corrupt.

It seems to me from what I read that the judge basically said the DA’s office did a sloppy job writing the Writ and that they were free to fix it and refile. I don’t see that as the judge’s fault.

Don’t get me wrong, I want Senovia seated and Benny booted as much as the rest of you but if the Writ needs to be fixed to make legal sense, the DA or Deputy should fix it. One must do these things by the book in order to avoid rulings being appealed and/or overturned in the future.

I dont think that the majority of commentators are suggesting the the Judge is guilty of intentional “wrong doing” . They are simply expressing frustration over the apparent delay in carrying out the will of the people in the recent elections. This is the reaction of a healthy electorate in a functioning democracy. They are not “whiners” They are citizens. And these citizens are being ripped off by a few greedy parasites. So keep up the pressure citizens until your voice is heard and kumar , benzeevi and their low life associates are sent packing to some third world country where the people dont talk back.

Thanks for that info Lisa…..but my personal opinion is still the same. Very disappointed in Judge Reed.

I believe Superior Court judges are appointed by the governor. California voted for that with a ballot proposition years ago. I think the rationale was to keep judges out of the dirty game of politics.