I’ll respond to you, “Jack,” and “Madeline” in one breath here because you’re both on the same computer IP address. Mathis had one (1) asset to list and failed to do so. We’ve not reported on his “success in Sacramento” because there’s nothing to report. Tell us, please, what he’s actually got passed. And if Mathis was “working on the Tulare hospital deal” he’s just as ineffective here as he is in Sacramento. Why, then, do I have in my desk two letters from Alberto Aguilar to two different Democratic assemblymen beseeching their assistance? This is Mathis working on the “Tulare hospital deal.” And about his yard: the neighbors didn’t complain that it was brown with drought. We didn’t print what they truly complained about. Do you want me to give voice to it here?

Geez guys don’t you have some REAL news to report on or are you just a gossip rag? Mathis’ yard was….what…brown, dead? Ummm we are in a drought! Sounds like Mathis did the responsible thing and stopped watering his lawn. This “neighbor” probably had a nice green, lush yard.

SMH

No mention about the millions Mathis got us for new wells. Nothing about the environmental waiver for the treatment plant that will save millions of gallons of water. No report on his success in Sacramento. Nothing, nada, zilch! Nope you report nonsense from sources that are scratching at best.

Btw, now that it’s out that Mathis was working on the Tulare hospital deal and your source was not exactly accurate are you going to print an apology to Mathis. BEFORE the election? Bet not!