there disgusting. fuck kun or coon grace homes.

i agree

People don’t cry “sexual harassment,” without having their eyes on reparations in the form of a cash payout. I’m not implying Mr. Luna sexually harassed anyone, I don’t know. This forum is not an ideal place to establish facts, however, is is a great way to influence (manipulate) public opinion.

In the most recent publication (1/21/16), third paragraph, Mr. Luna stated, “it would have been physically impossible” for him to have assaulted Sherrie Kuns-Fehlman because they were “never in the same place at the same time.” “Never” means at no time in the past or future; on no occasion; not ever. In the next sentence of that same paragraph, Mr. Luna stated that “he was in fact in the same room at the same time” when being introduced to her in her parent’s front room. As a teenager, I recall inviting a boy home to meet my parents. After the meeting we were walking out as my parents were resigning to the kitchen. In that brief moment, my date reached and grabbed my bottom without my parents even noticing. These things are rarely “physically impossible.”

Later, the same article tells the reader, “The Committee notes that both Fehlman and Luna were present at the May 11, 2015 meeting.” Are the board meeting minutes inaccurate or flawed, or is Mr. Luna just a poor historian? Maybe Mr. Luna’s definition of the word “never” is different from mine. Too much inconsistency already, which casts significant doubt in my mind. It makes me wonder what else is getting a little blurry, obscured, or swept under the rug. Again, as a reader, I simply do not know.

Regarding the investigation of Mr. Luna by the board of directors; they may as well have asked his mommy to investigate him. Of course there would be no finding of guilt. The bias is too strong and objectivity is a wishful illusion. One hand is washing the other and they are connected to the same dysfunctional body. Does the board of directors not know their responsibility? Fiduciary duty requires board members to stay objective, unselfish, responsible, honest, trustworthy, and efficient. Board members, as stewards of public trust, must never act for the benefit of themselves. It appears the board may not have met its responsibility because members should have excused themselves and opted for an independent investigation to guarantee objectivity and neutrality. They did not and it appears they acted in their own interest as they began circling the wagons.

The most recent article states that the committee found Sherrie Kuns-Fehlmen’s allegations of sexual harassment dubious (read hesitant, doubting, not reliable, suspect) because she did not report them right away. The committee found that the board of directors of Grace Homes did not learn of this allegation until July 10, 2015, nearly seven months after she claimed they happened. Following this logic, would make nearly 60 women’s sexual assault allegations against Bill Cosby, dating back as far as 1965, dubious as well. I think not.

I suspect the last to go will be Mr. Luna because he will hang on in an attempt to resurrect his soiled reputation. If that happens, there may be an investigation of the board of directors and no longer will the story be about Mr. Luna, Sherrie Kuns-Fehlman, or Mr. Kuns. As Mr. Luna stated, “you can’t un-ring that bell,” and the board ought to ask, as two earlier scholars once asked, “For whom the bell tolls,” maybe it tolls for thee!

the reporter said at the end of this article that the evidence provided by mr.luna does not prove his guilt or his innocence its for a jury to decide

Luna and Jenner wanted the interview with the Valley Voice to take place in his office so that I could see there was a glass door separating his office from his secretary’s office. This glass door between the two offices had no blinds and the secretary could easily see inside.

“The idea of closing the blinds is ridiculous and not possible,” Luna said.